HUM-351 / 2 crédits

Enseignant: Tormey Roland John

Langue: Anglais

Remark: Une seule inscription à un cours SHS+MGT autorisée. En cas d'inscriptions multiples elles seront toutes supprimées sans notification


Students will develop an understanding of the psychological and social processes of learning the following competences: (i) ethical sensitivity, (ii) ethical reasoning, (iii) ethical motivation, and (iv) ethical agency. Students will, at the same time, develop these capabilities.



Engineering Ethics; Learning Sciences; Emotion; Cognition

Learning Outcomes

By the end of the course, the student must be able to:

  • Describe what is meant by (i) ethical sensitivity, (ii) ethical reasoning capacity, (iii) ethical motivation and (iv) ethical agency
  • Apply these terms to understand pro-social behaviour of engineers
  • Describe how social factors (organisational climate, social group identity) enable or constrain pro-social behaviour in engineering contexts
  • Describe how cognitive and emotional factors interact in the learning of these ethical capabilities
  • Assess / Evaluate the likely impact of different ethics education strategies on students becoming ethical engineers

Transversal skills

  • Communicate effectively, being understood, including across different languages and cultures.
  • Take account of the social and human dimensions of the engineering profession.
  • Assess one's own level of skill acquisition, and plan their on-going learning goals.

Teaching methods

Teaching will include a mix of traditional lectures which will cover the psychological and social processes of learning to be ethical, as well as a series of activities in which these concepts will be applied by students.  In these applied exercises students will

(a) engage with an engineering ethics case study/dilemma

(b) analyse the dilemma in light of a series of guiding questions

(c) reflect on their learning from this and its potential application of to real world case scenarios

Expected student activities

Alongside some more traditional lectures, the teaching approach will prioritise active learning and collaborative group work.  Students are expected to participate actively in the learning activities which are managed in the class time and to complete some reading and application exercises after class.

Assessment methods

The course is assessed

80% through a portfolio in which students will collect artefacts (readings/ descriptions of experiences), and will analyse them in terms of the concepts of the course

20% through a (short) in-class assessment  based on assigned readings.



Downey, G. L. 2014. The Normative Contents of Engineering Formation: Engineering Studies, In Cambridge Handbook on Engineering Education Research, edited by Johri, A. and Olds, B., 673-711, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hoffman, M.L. 2008. Empathy and Prosocial Behaviour. In Handbook of Emotions, Third Edition, edited by Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J.M., and Feldman Barrett, L., 440-455, London: Guilford Press.

Lönngren, J. 2020. Exploring the discursive construction of ethics in an introductory engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1): 44-69

Van der Poel, I. and Royakkers, L. 2011.  Ethics, Technology and Engineering, An Introduction. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.



Ressources en bibliothèque

Moodle Link

Dans les plans d'études

  • Semestre: Automne
  • Nombre de places: 80
  • Forme de l'examen: Pendant le semestre (session d'hiver)
  • Matière examinée: Becoming an ethical engineer
  • Cours: 2 Heure(s) hebdo x 14 semaines

Semaine de référence


Cours connexes

Résultats de